For financial advisers - compiled by our team of experts, qualified in pensions, taxation, trusts and wealth transfer.
The ability to transfer between registered pension schemes has been a feature of the UK pension regime since the 1980s, allowing members to move their pension savings for a variety of reasons. But it has become increasingly important since the advent of DC 'pension freedom' in 2015.
However, defined benefit (DB) pension schemes offer valuable guarantees and the Regulator's view is that transferring away is unlikely to be beneficial for the majority of scheme members.
But for some, typically wealthier, individuals who aren't reliant on the guaranteed income for life provided by a DB pension, the DC 'pension freedoms' could provide a route to a more flexible retirement and increased death benefit options that better meet their needs.
Income drawdown under DC schemes can give the member greater flexibility and tax efficiency in how they take their pension savings. And the changes in how death benefits are taxed and who can benefit mean that the option of beneficiary's drawdown gives the ability to pass pension wealth down through the generations - or even to friends - very tax-efficiently outside the estate.
DB schemes are unlikely to provide the ability to vary retirement income and pension death benefits are limited to a taxable income for dependants only. An individual with no spouse/civil partner and only adult children could find that all their DB pension rights are extinguished on death.
However, moving from the security of DB to access DC flexibility normally brings a significant increase in risk for the individual - so it's not a decision to be taken lightly. It also comes at the cost of limiting future funding, as accessing income flexibly under a DC scheme invokes the 'money purchase annual allowance' (MPAA), which restricts DC contributions to no more than £10,000 a year (with no carry forward).
Being in the right pension for the member's needs is crucial. Advice is paramount to achieving the right outcome. And where the DB benefits have a transfer value of more than £30,000 advice is mandatory.
Members of occupational DB pension schemes have a statutory right to a transfer value, known as a cash equivalent transfer value (CETV), as long as:
The member can request a guaranteed transfer value once every 12 months. The trustees of the scheme can grant more frequent requests if they wish and even provide a CETV when a member doesn't have a statutory right to one.
Even though a member may have a statutory transfer right, unfunded public sector pension schemes (for example, the NHS Pension Scheme) cannot transfer benefits to a DC scheme capable of providing flexible benefits, such as income drawdown.
But transfers are allowed to DC schemes that don't provide flexible benefits. This allows members to transfer to buy conventional annuities, which could help those who are unlikely to get good value for money from their DB promise - for example, those in poor health or single people who have no need for a survivor's pension on their death.
Funded public schemes (for example, the Universities Superannuation Scheme) will allow transfers to DC schemes that offer income flexibility.
Regulations were introduced on 30 November 2021 to help protect members from pension scammers. The new rules allow pension trustees and scheme managers to refuse transfers where there's a suspicion of scam activity. When processing transfers, they’re encouraged to pass through several steps of due diligence, which includes flagging potential problem transfers as either ‘amber’ or ‘red’ flags.
The following types of schemes are deemed to be ‘safe destinations’ and are effectively exempt from these new rules:
'Safeguarded benefits' are certain pension benefits that provide security or valuable guarantees that can be lost if the member transfers or converts to get flexible benefits. Defined benefits fall into this category.
To make sure individuals are fully aware of what they could be giving up, they must get 'appropriate independent advice' from an FCA authorised adviser before they can proceed with a transfer - unless the value of the safeguarded benefits is £30,000 or less.
Some schemes have different categories of benefit, some of which are safeguarded benefits and others which aren't - e.g. an occupational scheme with both defined benefits and defined contribution funds. With such schemes it may be possible to transfer the non-safeguarded (DC) benefits without having to get financial advice - regardless of the value of the DB rights.
Confirmation that advice has been given
Before safeguarded benefits worth more than £30,000 can be transferred or converted, the individual must confirm to the trustees or scheme administrator of the transferring DB scheme that they've received 'appropriate independent advice' on the transaction.
This must be in the form of a written statement from the adviser confirming:
The adviser must provide this statement, regardless of whether they recommended a transfer or advised against it. Remember, the statement just confirms that the member has received advice on the matter from a suitably qualified and authorised professional - not what that advice was. Giving the statement doesn't imply the adviser endorses the member's course of action.
This adviser's statement must be given to the trustees or scheme administrator within three months of the individual receiving their CETV statement of entitlement.
The pension scheme trustees are responsible for deciding how transfer values should be calculated, based on guidance from the scheme actuary - particularly around appropriate assumptions about the future course of events affecting the scheme and the member's benefits.
There are five broad steps in the calculation:
In other words, the CETV is the estimated amount that would need to be invested now, based on assumed investment returns on the DB scheme assets between now and NPA, to deliver the estimated reserve needed at NPA to provide the expected DB pension income.
Although this broad approach to calculating DB transfer values is fairly standard, trustees have discretion over the assumptions used (to reflect the particular circumstances of their scheme) - so different schemes could offer very different transfer values for the same amount of DB pension.
Assumptions
The main assumptions made in DB transfer value calculations tie in with steps 2 to 5 above:
There's a choice of two methods available for calculating transfer values:
Further guidance on DB transfer values is available on the Pensions Regulator's website.
Reduced transfer value
It's possible, in certain circumstances, for the trustees of DB schemes to offer reduced transfer values less than the 'initial cash equivalent' under the best estimate method.
The funding situation of the scheme is one of the situations that allow a reduction. But cash equivalents may only be reduced for this reason after obtaining an insufficiency report. This is an assessment by the actuary of the funding of the scheme using the transfer value assumptions. Any reductions to transfer values taking scheme funding into account must not be more than the maximum reduction identified in the insufficiency report. And, if a transfer value is reduced on grounds of underfunding, the trustees must tell the member the extent of the reduction applied and when they expect to be able to pay a full transfer value.
Although trustees have the power to reduce CETVs to allow for low funding levels, there's no obligation for them to do so. The decision may hinge on the trustees' view of the strength of the employer covenant and the length of the scheme's funding recovery plan.
A binary 'all or nothing' transfer option doesn't always support the best member outcomes. While most people with a DB pension will be best advised to stick with it, a partial transfer could be the solution for those caught between needing some of the security of their DB promise and some of the income flexibility and estate planning opportunities offered by modern DC pensions.
Many schemes don't give the option of a partial DB transfer - there's currently no statutory right to a partial transfer of DB rights - but the number of schemes now offering them is on the rise. The barriers holding some DB schemes back from introducing a partial transfer option are the perceived complexity and cost. Legal fees to amend the scheme documents, actuarial fees to develop a transfer basis and the costs of implementing the necessary administrative processes can all be off-putting. But these are all achievable and the payback for all concerned could be worth it.
However, partial transfers are possible - to a certain extent - for members of mixed benefit schemes. They have a statutory right to transfer their DC rights and leave the DB pension behind (or vice versa).
When advising on a potential DB to DC transfer, advisers should always ask whether a partial transfer is available - so their advice can reflect all the options on the table.
HMRC take the view that transferring pension benefits from one scheme to another is a transfer of value for IHT. This is regardless of whether the pension benefits in both the original and the new scheme are outside the estate for IHT.
This will only potentially be an issue if the client was in poor health at the time of transfer. A Court of Appeal decision in the ‘Staveley Case’ has called into question HMRCs approach to transfers in ill-health.
HMRC haven’t updated their guidance following the decision which leaves an amount of uncertainty on the IHT position on transfers where a clients suspect they may not survive for more than two years from the date of transfer.
To avoid this uncertainty, it makes sense for any client considering a pension transfer to act before their health starts to decline.
More details on pension transfers and IHT are contained in our technical guide 'Pensions and IHT'.
Note - There's no IHT reporting to do at the time of a pension transfer. The executors only need to report it to HMRC (on form IHT409) if the individual dies within two years of the transfer.
There's an additional complication when transferring benefits which have:
Unless the transfer is part of a 'block transfer', the protection will normally be lost. However, protection can sometimes also remain on certain individual transfers or on scheme wind-up:
The transfer must represent the members' total rights under the transferring scheme and can't be split across more than one receiving scheme.
If any member involved in a block transfer has been a member of the receiving scheme for more than 12 months when the transfer is made, their transitional protection will normally* be lost - this includes all previous periods of membership of the scheme, even if the benefits have since been transferred out. But the block transfer will still be effective for the other member(s).
Of course, losing the protection may not be much of a concern if the level of tax-free cash is only marginally greater than 25%, or if benefits are unlikely to be taken before the normal minimum pension age - or perhaps if the benefits gained from transferring outweigh the loss of protection.
Our guides Scheme-specific tax-free cash protection and Pension age give more information on these protections.
Since 6 April 2023, fixed or enhanced protection can be lost on transfer in only limited circumstances - this depends on when the protection was registered:
Issued by a member of abrdn group, which comprises abrdn plc and its subsidiaries.
Any links to websites, other than those belonging to the abrdn group, are provided for general information purposes only. We accept no responsibility for the content of these websites, nor do we guarantee their availability.
Any reference to legislation and tax is based on abrdn’s understanding of United Kingdom law and HM Revenue & Customs practice at the date of production. These may be subject to change in the future. Tax rates and reliefs may be altered. The value of tax reliefs to the investor depends on their financial circumstances. No guarantees are given regarding the effectiveness of any arrangements entered into on the basis of these comments.
This website describes products and services provided by subsidiaries of abrdn group.
Full product and service provider details are described on the legal information.
abrdn plc is registered in Scotland (SC286832) at 1 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2LL
Standard Life Savings Limited is registered in Scotland (SC180203) at 1 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2LL.
Standard Life Savings Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
© 2024 abrdn plc. All rights reserved.